tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3564456973749856422Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:32:37 +0000http://www.hivmisdiagnosis.com/noreply@blogger.com (HIV is a Misdiagnosis)Blogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3564456973749856422.post-3675041548214500494Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:17:00 +00002009-10-10T12:20:34.009-06:00So I decided to look into PCP Pnuemonia outside of the HIV/AIDS Population.PCP does affect large portions of the immunocompromised, particularly those who have been subjected to corticosteroids to suppress their immunity. 91% of patients without HIV that presented with PCP had been on corticosteroids in the previous month to three months. It has been shown that there is a link between http://www.hivmisdiagnosis.com/2009/10/pcp-corticosteroids-and-aids.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (HIV is a Misdiagnosis)2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3564456973749856422.post-3997384708217544632Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:38:00 +00002009-10-03T14:26:44.246-06:00Ok... so in my little foray into blog world I have seemingly met someone from the mainstream that would like to help me clear up some of my confusion. So I have decided to start a new thread thats a little less stream of conscious and a little more focussed in an effort to get to the bottom of some things.One of my biggest confusions which is highly validated is the role of the mitochondria in http://www.hivmisdiagnosis.com/2009/10/mitochondria-degenerative-diseases-or.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (HIV is a Misdiagnosis)15tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3564456973749856422.post-2900541031812564326Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:24:00 +00002009-09-30T18:05:07.885-06:00On this topic firstly I have to ask myself... has something truly been validated when absolutely no one is allowed to question or even verify that validation? When simply the process used for that validation has been questioned. Whats so wrong to call for a better form of validation than one that seemingly has flaws? What's most disconcerting is when those who are capable of validating that http://www.hivmisdiagnosis.com/2009/09/validation-vs-speculation.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (HIV is a Misdiagnosis)21tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3564456973749856422.post-6172484404643021234Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:46:00 +00002009-09-26T19:51:05.072-06:00This is my critique of what I found to be one of the most eye opening and objective documentaries I have seen in a long time. And it is also a response to the many people writing about this film... many I have to say have either honestly have not seen the film, or were surprised at the aggression faced when being a supporter of such notions, or at least expressed being enlightened by such http://www.hivmisdiagnosis.com/2009/09/house-of-numbers-and-all-this-blind.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (HIV is a Misdiagnosis)7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3564456973749856422.post-5234269474089527966Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:38:00 +00002009-09-26T13:18:12.153-06:00Firstly I want to say, I do not consider myself a dissident, nor do I identify with the term that the mainstream has coined because of some very logial questions... denialist. My position is that we need to "Rethink" AIDS. We need to allow doctors and researchers to use the scientific process to validate that things do or don't add up, as there are a substantial number of credentialled http://www.hivmisdiagnosis.com/2009/09/welcome.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (HIV is a Misdiagnosis)18